Title: Probably a silly rules question sorry Post by: Axel Chohimajin on February 09, 2011, 10:00:03 am I'm looking to try Twilight out of friday with a friend but, I can't seem to make sense of the stones result rules on the downloaded rules update 2010 from the website. I though I understood perfectly but then the example throws me off, it seems to me that the Devanu sides 4 Oran would counter the 4 Erac by the Fubarnii and then the Devanu would be up 2 Erac before adjustments making the rest of the combat a bit strange. I can understand the rest of the combat and how the cut and thrust plays out, just not the initial result.
So I guess I am wondering if I'm missing something or being a bit silly? Title: Re: Probably a silly rules question sorry Post by: Carcharoth on February 09, 2011, 12:01:57 pm Don't worry at all about asking silly questions! :)
In that example the Devanu selected to cast 4 Erac and 2 Oran, but when he cast them he only managed to get 1 successful oran and 1 successful erac (see the diagram, it isn't explicitly stated in the text). The Fubarnii cast 4 erac, and managed 2 successes. At that stage the Devanu's oran would cancel one of the Fubarnii's erac, so both sides would land a single blow. Hopefully the rest of the example makes sense from there in, but feel free to ask if you need any more clarification. Title: Re: Probably a silly rules question sorry Post by: Axel Chohimajin on February 09, 2011, 12:18:22 pm Oh wait a minute by cast them it literally means throw them right? If they land face up they are a success, face down a failure?
Title: Re: Probably a silly rules question sorry Post by: Carcharoth on February 09, 2011, 12:23:42 pm Yup, I was just awkward and used the word 'cast' rather than 'throw' when talking about combat stones... So a success means it lands face up, and a failure means it lands face down.
Title: Re: Probably a silly rules question sorry Post by: Axel Chohimajin on February 09, 2011, 12:31:26 pm Ah that totally makes sense now I was thinking you selected and then played poker style mind games, but I was struggling to see how more stones wouldn't win every time
Title: Re: Probably a silly rules question sorry Post by: Brandlin on February 09, 2011, 10:26:01 pm there are rules?
no body tells me anything round here! i just look at the pretty shiny models! Title: Re: Probably a silly rules question sorry Post by: Axel Chohimajin on February 10, 2011, 10:09:32 am You and me both
...stares at closet full of unpainted and unassembled models :'( Title: Re: Probably a silly rules question sorry Post by: Napar on May 22, 2011, 04:15:43 pm I was about to ask the same silly question. I'm happy I did some searching around! Wow this helps me out so much!
|